Claims

Structured inquiry instruction produces significantly higher geometry concept understanding than conventional instruction in a quasi-experiment

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · checked against its sources 2026-11-01 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students taught geometry with a structured inquiry model showed significantly higher concept understanding than students taught with conventional models (Kruskal-Wallis chi-square 35.20, Asym. sig. 0.000). → Salim 2015

Evidence

Salim 2015

Salim, K. & Tiawa, D.H. (2015). Implementation of Structured Inquiry Based Model Learning Toward Students' Understanding of Geometry. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 1(1), 75-83. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105196

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental posttest-only control study with 58 students (29 experimental, 29 control) at SMAN 3 Tanjungpinang; the experimental class mean was 78.62 versus 65.21 in the control class, and the Kruskal-Wallis test gave "Chi-Square 35.20" with Asym. sig. 0.000.

"There are significant differences between students' understanding of concepts that get structured inquiry learning with understanding the concept of learning by students who received conventional models."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.