Student assessors led the pilot assessment of the Centering Students' Diverse Lived Experiences badge, shifting evaluation power toward student voice¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · checked against its sources 2026-10-09 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Five trained student assessors, each application reviewed by at least two students, evaluated CSDLE pilot submissions and converged with the project team on finalized badge language. → Van Nostrand 2025
Evidence¶
Van Nostrand 2025¶
Van Nostrand, P., Noakes, S., Foster, A. J., & Burstein, R. (2025). Putting learners first: Broadening access through technology evaluation in California Community Colleges. Digital Promise. https://doi.org/10.51388/20.500.12265/279
q2 · i? · design · r2
Pilot assessment stage of the CSDLE badge, run with the CCC Student Centered Design Lab, which received over 500 student applications for the assessor role. After evaluating submissions, "student assessors convened with Digital Promise and the CO team to discuss discrepancies in evaluation, come to consensus, and reflect those decisions in the finalized badge application language".
"The SCDL selected five students who spanned a range of geographies, campuses, ages, and backgrounds. These student assessors were then trained on the pilot application for the CSDLE badge. At least two students were assigned to review each application."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Educators sustained the student voice and leadership tenet by incorporating student input and co-leadership into their ongoing roles — related
- Online peer assessment shifts instructional assessment from teacher-controlled to a combination of teacher assessment and student peer assessment — related
- Peer assessment improves academic performance by a small average amount relative to no assessment or to teacher assessment — related
- The quality of feedback students give peers predicts gains in their own work, but no recorded study isolates a causal benefit of the assessor role — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
student-assessors-led-csdle-pilot-assessment |
title |
Student assessors led the pilot assessment of the Centering Students' Diverse Lived Experiences badge, shifting evaluation power toward student voice |
description |
Student assessors led the pilot assessment of the Centering Students' Diverse Lived Experiences badge, shifting evaluation power toward student voice |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
source_checked |
2026-10-09 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — van-nostrand-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.