The student-centered shift in reflective discussion between Sessions #1 and #3 remained only in the experimental condition, with a medium effect size¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i2 A significant Session #1–#3 shift along the x-axis toward student-centered perspectives with d = 0.54 was observed only in the experimental condition. → Mochizuki 2022
Evidence¶
Mochizuki 2022¶
Mochizuki, T., Sasaki, H., Wakimoto, T., Kubota, Y., Eagan, B., Hirayama, R., Yamaguchi, Y., Yuki, N., Funaoi, H., Suzuki, H., & Kato, H. (2022). Mediating and perspective-taking manipulatives: Fostering dynamic perspective-taking by mediating dialogic thinking and bolstering empathy in role-play and reflection for microteaching. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-022-09382-w
q2 · i2 · causal · r2
Two-sample t-tests comparing ENA mean plots across sessions within each condition (Table 8) showed the Session #1–#3 student-centered shift "remained only in the experimental condition"; the authors interpret this as gradual enhancement of student-centered perspectives across sessions in that group only.
"Finally, there was a significant shift between Sessions #1 and #3, which remained only in the experimental condition along the x-axis and focused more on student-centered perspectives with a medium effect size (d = 0.54). These results indicate that only in the experimental group was there a gradual enhancement in student-centered perspectives across the three sessions."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Reflecting with the 3D manipulable animation made Session #3 reflective discussions more student-centered than reflecting with video only — related
- Qualitative analysis of viewpoint-switching scenes indicated the 3D perspective-taking manipulatives bolstered perspective-taking via the nonverbal LED-status representations of students' states — related
- Tangible puppetry role-play shifted microteaching discourse from formal planned utterances toward informal student voices, and the shift persisted into a subsequent self-performed role-play — related
- Combining tangible puppets as mediating manipulatives with 3D manipulable animations fostered immediate transfer of imaginary students' perspectives in microteaching role-plays — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
student-centered-shift-persisted-only-experimental-group |
title |
The student-centered shift in reflective discussion between Sessions #1 and #3 remained only in the experimental condition, with a medium effect size |
description |
The student-centered shift in reflective discussion between Sessions #1 and #3 remained only in the experimental condition, with a medium effect size |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — mochizuki-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.