Over 95% of student-authored questions included an explanation, mostly of good or excellent quality¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q3·i2medium
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In Physics 1A repositories, over 95% of questions had an explanation and approximately two-thirds were rated good or excellent in each year. → Bates 2013
Evidence¶
Bates 2013¶
Bates, S. P., Galloway, R. K., Riise, J., and Homer, D. (2013). Assessing the quality of a student-generated question repository. https://arxiv.org/abs/1308.2202 doi:10.48550/arxiv.1308.2202
q3 · i2 · design · r2
Rating of explanations accompanying sampled Physics 1A questions (N=150 and N=200) on a five-point rubric (Table II), shown in Figure 3. The article reports "over 95% of cases students did construct an explanation" and roughly two-thirds good or excellent. No effect size is printed.
"The figure shows that in over 95% of cases students did construct an explanation of some kind, and in the vast majority of cases these were of good or excellent quality (approximately two-thirds of the questions sampled were in the ‘good’ or ‘excellent’ categories for each of the two years)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- 75% of student-authored physics questions met combined high-quality criteria (clear, correct, plausible distractors, above recall, adequate explanation) — related
- Explanation-quality distributions differed significantly between years for Physics 1A (2011 slightly lower) but not Physics 1B — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
student-explanations-majority-good-or-excellent |
title |
Over 95% of student-authored questions included an explanation, mostly of good or excellent quality |
description |
Over 95% of student-authored questions included an explanation, mostly of good or excellent quality |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2013 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — bates-2013 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.