Claims

Root canal treatment by undergraduate students succeeds more often in teeth with vital pulps (87.8%) than necrotic pulps (65.6%)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? In the weighted meta‐analysis of student‐performed root canal treatment, teeth diagnosed with vital pulp had a success rate of 87.8% while teeth with pulp necrosis had 65.6%. → Chien 2025

Evidence

Chien 2025

Chien, P.Y.‐H., Hosseinpour, S., Peters, O.A. & Peters, C.I. (2025). Outcomes of root canal treatment performed by undergraduate students: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. International Endodontic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.14246

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r1

Weighted pooled success rates from a random‐effects meta‐analysis (DerSimonian and Laird) of the three studies eligible for meta‐analysis, covering 771 roots. The review reports "teeth with vital pulps (87.8%)" versus necrotic pulps at 65.6%; no standardized effect size is printed.

"Success rates were notably greater for teeth with vital pulps (87.8%) compared with necrotic pulps (65.6%)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.