Claims

Students showed no statistically significant apprehension about trusting automated feedback validity, and favoured granular automated marginalia over generalised human feedback

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? An independent samples t-test on Trust in Automated Feedback Validity showed no statistically significant apprehension; students explicitly favoured the objective, granular marginalia over conventional human remarks. → Matey Yordanov 2026

Evidence

Matey Yordanov 2026

Matey Yordanov, Mikhail Bychkov, and Andrei Kuchma. (2026). The Effect of High-Frequency, Automatically-marked Formative Assessments on Student Outcomes in A-Level Sciences. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.23566 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.23566

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Post-intervention survey in the quasi-experiment; the trust construct was a composite mean of 5-point Likert items. The article reports no significant apprehension and that students "explicit favoured the objective, granular marginalia" over remarks such as "Good effort"; no effect size is printed, so equivalence was not tested.

"An independent samples t-test assessing “Trust in Automated Feedback Validity“ showed no statistically significant apprehension."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id student-trust-in-automated-feedback-null-apprehension
title Students showed no statistically significant apprehension about trusting automated feedback validity, and favoured granular automated marginalia over generalised human feedback
description Students showed no statistically significant apprehension about trusting automated feedback validity, and favoured granular automated marginalia over generalised human feedback
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — matey-yordanov-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.