Claims

Students judged mathematics unsuitable for performing-arts teaching (f = 13) while endorsing social studies, theology, science, Turkish, and English

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students most frequently named Mathematics (f = 13) as a course that could not be taught through performing arts, and named Social Studies (f = 15), Theology (f = 13), Science (f = 10), Turkish Language (f = 8), and English Language (f = 7) as suitable. → Kenan BAŞ 2019

Evidence

Kenan BAŞ 2019

Kenan BAŞ, Esen DURMUŞ. (2019). Pre-test the Effect of Teaching Social Studies Course through Performing Arts on the Students’ Academic Achievement and Permanence of their Knowledge. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies 7(2). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.7n.2p.107

q2 · i? · qualitative · r2

From the qualitative interviews with 15 experimental-group students: responses on which courses should or should not be taught through performing arts were themed and frequency-counted. Note the article's own inconsistency: English appears both as unsuitable (f = 3) and suitable (f = 7).

"it is seen that the students stated that Mathematics (f=13) was the course that could not be taught through performing arts method. However, it was stated by some other students (f=3) that it was not appropriate to teach English language lessons through performing arts method"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.