Students agreed that Learning Analytics SRL rubric scores represented their approach to learning well¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Participants reported agreement that the Learning Analytics SRL rubric scores they received represented well their approach to learning in their subject (n = 17, M = 5.05, SD = 0.75). → de Barba 2025

Evidence¶

de Barba 2025¶

de Barba, P. G., Oliveira, E. A., & English, N. (2025). Development and validation of a learning analytics rubric for self-regulated learning. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10521-x

q2 · i? · design · r2

Students completed an online satisfaction survey at week 6 and week 12 of the semester using a 7-point Likert scale from '1 = Strongly disagree' to '7 = Strongly agree'. The mean of 5.05 indicates agreement that system-generated scores represented their approach to learning.

"Overall, participants reported in the online survey that they agreed that the Learning Analytics SRL rubric scores they received represented well their approach to learning in their subject (n = 17, M = 5.05, SD = 0.75)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Five of seven SRL rubric indicators showed convergence between student self-assessments and system-generated scores — related
• LLM-based rubric scores agreed with expert ratings at the total-score level and on cognitive-process dimensions, but agreement was low for more subjective dimensions — related
• The Bloom-driven framework generalizes to social-science questions, with automated rubrics agreeing strongly with experts on usability but only modestly on Bloom level — related
• Two of seven SRL rubric indicators showed significant discrepancy between student self-assessments and system-generated scores — related