Claims

Students reported feeling more comfortable giving technical seminars before peers than before teachers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students found it more comfortable presenting before their peer group than in front of teachers, maintaining proper eye contact and performing audaciously. → Vani 2015

Evidence

Vani 2015

V. Vijaya Vani. (2015). The Impact of Peer Observation and Feedback on Technical Seminar Presentations: A Constructive Model. i-manager's Journal of English Language Teaching, Vol. 5, No. 3, July-September. https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/article/peer-observation

q2 · i? · design · r2

Self-reported views of the study participants, collected after the second spell of peer observation and feedback. The article reports this as a recognized pattern in the obtained data with no statistical test or effect size.

"It is recognized from the obtained data that students found it more comfortable giving their technical seminar presentations before their peer group than giving in front of their teachers as they maintained proper eye contact and were audacious in their performance."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.