In a course that had removed examinations, most student groups designing a fair grading policy reinvented proctored or handwritten assessment¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q1
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Of the groups whose proposed weighting was recorded, all but one introduced some form of proctored, handwritten, oral, or quiz-based assessment, and four placed roughly sixty to seventy percent of the grade on a proctored or handwritten component. → Yusuf Pisan 2026
Evidence¶
Yusuf Pisan 2026¶
Yusuf Pisan. (2026). Teaching Intro AI When the Tools Can Do the Homework: A Course Redesign and a Student Bill of Rights. https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.05175 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.05175
q1 · i? · design · r2
In-class group exercise (the AI Grading Paradox, week 4; 36 present, seven submissions) in which groups stress-tested four grading models and designed their own ideal policy for an AI-required, exam-free course. The instructor reports, via the Gemini-generated summary, that "all but one introduced some form of proctored, handwritten, oral, or quiz-based assessment."
"Of the groups whose proposed weighting the summary recorded, all but one introduced some form of proctored, handwritten, oral, or quiz-based assessment, and four placed a clear majority of the grade, on the order of sixty to seventy percent, on a proctored or handwritten component, with homework reduced to completion credit."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Educators run more proctored AI-free assessments conditionally on compromised outcomes, and reject AI detectors based on classroom experience of false positives
- In AI-assisted software engineering courses, AI-required and programming work carry high median grade weights while proctored assessment is rare
- AI-assisted software engineering courses assess primarily through participation, project work, and coding assignments rather than exams — related
- Students report that tests dominate assessment, carry too much weight, and create stress, while extended performance-based assessments offer better opportunities to learn and showcase learning — related
- Students taking online and proctored online exams report higher test anxiety than students taking on-campus exams and non-proctored online exams — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
students-reinvented-exams-in-ai-course-grading-design |
title |
In a course that had removed examinations, most student groups designing a fair grading policy reinvented proctored or handwritten assessment |
description |
In a course that had removed examinations, most student groups designing a fair grading policy reinvented proctored or handwritten assessment |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — yusuf-pisan-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.