Model-estimated mixture weights show no detectable difference between control and experimental groups in Study 2¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r? · q3
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Independent-samples t-tests on estimated mixture weights found no differences between control and experimental groups for either the pre-learning or post-learning emotions models, so the groups' data were combined. → The Dynamic Interplay Between Goal Setting 2022

Evidence¶

The Dynamic Interplay Between Goal Setting 2022¶

The Dynamic Interplay Between Goal Setting, Performance, and Emotions in Self-Regulated Learning: A Computational Modeling Approach — Supplementary Materials. (2022). https://gpemodel.shinyapps.io/gpe-model/

q3 · i? · causal · r?

Group-comparability check in Study 2 using mixture weights estimated by the hypothesized model for each participant. For the pre-learning model the control (M = .38) and experimental (M = .40) groups did not differ, t(303) = 1.175, p = .241; for the post-learning model, t(303) = 0.208, p = .836.

"For the pre-learning emotions model, there were also no differences in the estimated mixture weights between the control group (M = .38, SD = 0.12) and the experimental group (M = .40, SD = .11), t(303) = 1.175, p = .241."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Experimental and control groups did not differ significantly on pre-test NOS or SK scores — related
• In one nonequivalent-groups study of pre-school prospective teachers, the group taught with formative assessment embedded in explicit-reflective instruction scored higher on post-test NOS and SK than the group taught with explicit-reflective instruction alone — related