Study 2 replicates the absence of group differences in recognition and monitoring resolution in the paired-associates task¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In Study 2, the paired-associates task MANOVA again showed no significant group differences between 36 native and 36 non-native speaking fourth graders in recognition or monitoring resolution. → Buehler 2021
Evidence¶
Buehler 2021¶
Buehler, F. J., van Loon, M. H., Bayard, N. S., Steiner, M., & Roebers, C. M. (2021). Comparing metacognitive monitoring between native and non-native speaking primary school students. Metacognition and Learning, 16, 749–768. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09261-z
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Study 2 matched 36 native and 36 non-native speaking fourth graders and repeated the identical Kanji paired-associates task. The MANOVA replicated Study 1: "no significant group difference between native and non-native speaking students" (F(3, 68) = 0.4; p = 0.75; η2p = 0.02).
"Using Pillai’s trace, there was no significant group difference between native and non-native speaking students, F(3, 68) = 0.4; p = 0.75; η2p = 0.02. Thus, as hypothesized and replicating findings from Study 1, native and non-native speaking children did not differ significantly in their metacognitive monitoring (resolution) and recognition in the paired-associates task."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Metacognitive monitoring deficits are unlikely to be the primary source of academic performance differences between native and non-native speaking students — a broader claim this one bears on
- Native and non-native speaking fourth graders do not differ in recognition or metacognitive monitoring resolution in a paired-associates task (Study 1) — related
- Native and non-native speaking fourth graders do not differ in monitoring resolution of their open-ended text comprehension answers (Study 2) — related
- Native speaking fourth graders answered more open-ended text comprehension questions correctly than non-native speakers (Study 2) — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
study2-replication-paired-associates-null |
title |
Study 2 replicates the absence of group differences in recognition and monitoring resolution in the paired-associates task |
description |
Study 2 replicates the absence of group differences in recognition and monitoring resolution in the paired-associates task |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — buehler-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.