Policy guidance is most actionable for final-output substitution scenarios¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Across the scenario stress test, substitution averaged 2.49/4 actionability with clear answers in 83% of packages, higher than the other five scenarios. → Kai Yao 2026

Evidence¶

Kai Yao 2026¶

Kai Yao. (2026). What Does the Credential Still Certify? Cognitive Stewardship for AI-Mediated Education. arXiv preprint. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.19988 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.19988

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Scenario stress test across 180 policy-by-scenario observations from the 30-package corpus, scored on a 0-4 actionability sum. The quote shows "Substitution was the most actionable case"; Table 3 reports the other five scenarios ranging from 1.17 to 2.32.

"Substitution was the most actionable case, averaging 2.49/4 with clear answers in 83% of packages, because final-output replacement fits familiar academic-integrity categories."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Output-verification support is the least covered scenario in policy guidance — related
• Human guidance remains essential for ethical grounding when integrating AI with situated learning, including resisting complacency toward generative AI outputs — related
• Policy packages fall into four archetypes defined by which design element is missing — related
• Safeguards in university AI policies are sparse and unevenly covered — related