Successive processing measures show the fewest significant correlations with other speeded measures, particularly in Chinese and Greek groups¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2021: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Successive processing measures revealed the smallest number of significant correlations with other measures, particularly in the Chinese and Greek groups. → Papadopoulos 2018

Evidence¶

Papadopoulos 2018¶

Papadopoulos, T. C., Georgiou, G. K., Deng, C., & Das, J. P. (2018). The Structure of Speed of Processing Across Cultures. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 14(3), 112–125. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0243-7

q3 · i? · associational · r2

A correlational analysis (Table 2) of the eight response-time measures in each cultural group showed most measures interrelated, with the two measures of each latent factor strongly related. Successive processing measures (Word Series, Sentence Questions) showed the fewest significant correlations, especially in the Chinese and Greek samples.

"successive processing measures revealed the smallest number of significant correlations with the other measures, particularly in the Chinese and Greek groups"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Processing speed measured with response times is better represented as four distinct cognitive processes (planning, attention, simultaneous, successive) than as a unitary speed factor — related
• The distinct abilities structure of processing speed is invariant across Chinese, Canadian, and Greek cultural groups — related
• The unitary ability processing speed model fits significantly worse than the bifactor model in the Canadian and Greek groups — related