Claims

Substantial drops in word problem solving accuracy occurred from Wave 2 to Wave 3 for children with math difficulties, while children without MD showed steady increases

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Children with MD showed substantial drops in performance from Wave 2 to Wave 3, whereas children without MD showed steady increases across testing waves. → Swanson 2013

Evidence

Swanson 2013

Swanson, H. L., Lussier, C. M., & Orosco, M. J. (2013). Cognitive Strategies, Working Memory, and Growth in Word Problem Solving in Children With Math Difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(4), 339–358. doi:10.1177/0022219413498771

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Figures 2 and 3 (Panels a and b) intent-to-treat growth analysis; the article describes "substantial drops in performance from Wave 2 to Wave 3" for children with MD, with a roughly 3-month summer break between waves.

"There were substantial drops in performance from Wave 2 to Wave 3 in accuracy scores as a function of treatment conditions. In contrast, as shown in Panel b, children without MD showed steady increases in performance across the testing waves."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.