Substantial drops in word problem solving accuracy occurred from Wave 2 to Wave 3 for children with math difficulties, while children without MD showed steady increases¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Children with MD showed substantial drops in performance from Wave 2 to Wave 3, whereas children without MD showed steady increases across testing waves. → Swanson 2013
Evidence¶
Swanson 2013¶
Swanson, H. L., Lussier, C. M., & Orosco, M. J. (2013). Cognitive Strategies, Working Memory, and Growth in Word Problem Solving in Children With Math Difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(4), 339–358. doi:10.1177/0022219413498771
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Figures 2 and 3 (Panels a and b) intent-to-treat growth analysis; the article describes "substantial drops in performance from Wave 2 to Wave 3" for children with MD, with a roughly 3-month summer break between waves.
"There were substantial drops in performance from Wave 2 to Wave 3 in accuracy scores as a function of treatment conditions. In contrast, as shown in Panel b, children without MD showed steady increases in performance across the testing waves."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.