Observational learners read and filter more than hypermedia learners, and hypermedia learners check more solution steps than self-explanation learners¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Within superficial processing, observational learners read and filtered significantly more than hypermedia learners, while hypermedia learners checked significantly more solution steps than self-explanation-based learners. → Tessa H. S. Eysink & Ton de Jong 2012

Evidence¶

Tessa H. S. Eysink & Ton de Jong 2012¶

Tessa H. S. Eysink & Ton de Jong (2012). Does Instructional Approach Matter? How Elaboration Plays a Crucial Role in Multimedia Learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508406.2011.611776

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Bonferroni-corrected Mann-Whitney pairwise comparisons on the two superficial subcategories from the think-aloud experiment, showing distinct superficial-processing profiles across the instructional approaches.

"learners in the observational learning environment read and filtered signifi- cantly more than learners in the hypermedia learning environment ( Z = –2.88, p < .008). Furthermore, learners in the hypermedia learning environment checked significantly more solution steps than those in the self-explanation-based learning environment (Z = –2.81, p < .008)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Hypermedia learners show the lowest total engagement in learning processes, devoting most processing to superficial activities — related
• Self-explanation-based and inquiry learning environments elicit significantly more total learning-process instances than hypermedia and observational learning environments — related