Provided support does not influence task regulation between conditions¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? No significant differences in task regulation were found between the three conditions. → Saab 2012

Evidence¶

Saab 2012¶

Saab, N., van Joolingen, W., & van Hout-Wolters, B. (2012). Support of the collaborative inquiry learning process: influence of support on task and team regulation. Metacognition and Learning, 7, 7-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-011-9068-6

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Null result from the same MANCOVA comparing conditions on task regulation frequencies; the univariate team regulation effect was significant but task regulation was not. Equivalence was not tested.

"Another interesting result is the lacking of significant differences in task regulation between the different conditions. Clearly, the provided support does not influence the task regulation process."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Support conditions did not differ from control in learning scores within the environment — related
• RIDE communication instruction and RIDE plus CHT both increase team regulation relative to no support — reports the opposite
• Team regulation correlates positively with learning results only in the CHT condition — related
• Instruction combining communication rules (RIDE) and a hypothesis tool (CHT) increases team regulation in computer-supported collaborative inquiry, and team regulation relates to learning outcomes only in that combined condition — related