Claims

Use of a surgical safety checklist alongside team training was associated with the lowest adverse event rate compared with a historical control and team training without a checklist

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The surgical safety checklist group had significantly lower adverse event rates (8.9%) than a historical control group (23.6%) and a team-training-without-checklist group (15.9%). → Costar 2020

Evidence

Costar 2020

Costar, D. M., & Hall, K. K. (2020). Improving Team Performance and Patient Safety on the Job Through Team Training and Performance Support Tools: A Systematic Review. Journal of Patient Safety. https://doi.org/10.1097/PTS.0000000000000746

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review reports a three-group comparison of adverse event rates: checklist group "8.9%", historical control "23.6%", and team training without checklist "15.9%". The comparison is against a historical control group; no test statistic or effect size is printed.

"Bliss et al9 where they reported that the use of a surgical safety checklist was associated with significantly lower adverse event rates (8.9%) as compared with the performance of a historical control group (23.6%) and a group that had received team training with no checklist (15.9%)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.