The model explains substantial variance in emotional engagement and active learning with good predictive relevance¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2021: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The model explains 54.12% of variance in emotional engagement and 53.45% in active learning, with Q2 values of 0.38 and 0.37 and SRMR of 0.055. → Molinillo 2018

Evidence¶

Molinillo 2018¶

Molinillo, S., Aguilar-Illescas, R., Anaya-Sánchez, R., & Vallespín-Arán, M. (2018). Exploring the impacts of interactions, social presence and emotional engagement on active collaborative learning in a social web-based environment. Computers & Education, 123, 41-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.04.012

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Structural model assessment via PLS-SEM (SmartPLS 3.0, 5,000 bootstrap subsamples); R2 values of "emotional engagement (54.12%) and active learning (53.45%)" were reported, with Q2 of 0.38 and 0.37 and SRMR 0.055.

"The model explains a great deal of the variance of the endogenous constructs: emotional engagement (54.12%) and active learning (53.45%)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The integrated model explains substantial variance in student engagement (R² = 0.700) in GenAI-supported learning — related
• The serial mediation model explains 32.5–37.0% of variance in AI-TPACK, self-efficacy, and AI integration intention — related
• The final pruned mediation model fits the data excellently and accounts for 58.0%, 62.2%, and 53.2% of variance in later calculations, word-problem solving, and reading — related
• The integrated model explains 57.1% of satisfaction, 32.2% of use, and 52.5% of individual impact variance — related