Claims

Switch-on Reading shows a considerably higher effect for pupils with special educational needs (+0.33)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The effect size for SEN pupils (+0.33 on gain scores) is considerably higher than for non-SEN pupils. → Gorard et al. 2014

Evidence

Gorard et al. 2014

Stephen Gorard, Beng Huat See, Nadia Siddiqui. (2014). Switch-on Reading: Evaluation Report and Executive Summary. Education Endowment Foundation. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/evaluation

q3 · i? · causal · r3

Subgroup analysis of the randomised trial: SEN pupils (n=225) showed +0.33 (CI 0.04 to 0.57) on gain scores; the report calls it "intriguing that the intervention appears to be especially effective for them".

"A slightly different picture emerges from consideration of pupils reported by their schools to have special needs or specific learning challenges (SEN). The effect size for these pupils is considerably higher than for the rest"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.