Children who synchronize at only one beat rate fall statistically between the other two groups, with mostly non-significant differences¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The 56 Synchronizers-at-one-rate-only showed significant pairwise differences with the other groups only for rapid automatized naming (p = 0.004) behaviorally and for envelope-encoding precision (p = 0.036) neurally; behavioral group differences were otherwise not significant. → Silvia Bonacina 2021
Evidence¶
Silvia Bonacina 2021¶
Silvia Bonacina, Stephanie Huang, Travis White-Schwoch, Jennifer Krizman, Trent Nicol and Nina Kraus. (2021). Rhythm, reading, and sound processing in the brain in preschool children. npj Science of Learning 6:20. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00097-5
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Post hoc pairwise comparisons for the third group of 56 children (mean age 3.8) against Synchronizers and Non-synchronizers; the article reports "meaningful differences only for Phonological awareness (trending, p = 0.064) and Rapid automatized naming ( p = 0.004)". For FFR measures, only envelope-encoding precision differed significantly (p = 0.036).
"the behavioral data did not show signi ficant differences between the “Synchronizers-at-one-rate-only” group and the other two groups (pairwise comparisons revealed meaningful differences only for Phonologi- cal awareness (trending, p = 0.064) and Rapid automatized naming ( p = 0.004)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Synchronizers show more precise speech-envelope encoding in the FFR, with the group difference modulated by presentation mode, time region, and stimulus — related
- Preschoolers who synchronize well to a beat outscore poor synchronizers on phonological awareness, auditory short-term memory, and rapid automatized naming — related
- Synchronizers have more consistent FFRs than Non-synchronizers, with group differences shaped by polarity, presentation mode, and time region — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
synchronizers-one-rate-only-intermediate |
title |
Children who synchronize at only one beat rate fall statistically between the other two groups, with mostly non-significant differences |
description |
Children who synchronize at only one beat rate fall statistically between the other two groups, with mostly non-significant differences |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — silvia-bonacina-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.