A substantial proportion of distance students (44,035 of 76,485) used the AI-based learning assistant Syntea during one observation month¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? During the February 2025 observation period, 44,035 of 76,485 enrolled distance students used Syntea, most of them returning users. → Kristina Schaaff 2026
Evidence¶
Kristina Schaaff 2026¶
Kristina Schaaff, Quintus Stierstorfer and Valerie Hekkel. (2026). Using AI-based Learning Assistants in Higher Education: A Large-Scale Descriptive Analysis. https://arxiv.org/abs/2607.08748 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2607.08748
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Descriptive log-data analysis of all Bachelor's and Master's distance students active in February 2025 at IU, after cleaning removed 78 incomplete records. The article reports "44,035 out of the 76,485 students in our sample used Syntea", with 2,509 first-time and 41,526 returning users; no effect size is printed.
"During our observation period, a total of 44,035 out of the 76,485 students in our sample used Syntea. 2,509 students used Syntea for the first time during this period, while 41,526 students were returning users."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Syntea usage rates differ slightly by gender, with female students (59.05%) higher than male students (54.94%) — related
- Full-time students use Syntea slightly more than part-time students (59.49% vs 55.71%) — related
- Syntea adoption is highest among Gen Z students (63.66%) and declines across older generational cohorts — related
- Syntea usage is slightly higher among Bachelor's (58.17%) than Master's students (54.25%), possibly reflecting program structure rather than acceptance — related
- Syntea usage concentrates on weekdays and daytime hours, with part-time students shifting use to weekends and evenings relative to full-time students — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
syntea-substantial-adoption-distance-students |
title |
A substantial proportion of distance students (44,035 of 76,485) used the AI-based learning assistant Syntea during one observation month |
description |
A substantial proportion of distance students (44,035 of 76,485) used the AI-based learning assistant Syntea during one observation month |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — kristina-schaaff-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.