The TQsrl and SQsrl questionnaires are validated instruments measuring SRL sub-processes with emphasis on reflection¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2028: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The teacher questionnaire TQsrl reduced 42 items to 31 across six factors with high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.94 in EFA and 0.93 in CFA). → Avivit Arvatz 2025 q2 i? The student questionnaire SQsrl reduced to 15 items across five factors (alpha 0.91 EFA, 0.88 CFA), splitting reflection into reflection on action and reflection for action. → Avivit Arvatz 2025 (2)

Evidence¶

Avivit Arvatz 2025¶

Avivit Arvatz, Roee Peretz, Yehudit Judy Dori. (2025). Self-regulated learning and reflection: a tool for teachers and students. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-025-09415-3

q2 · i? · design · r2

Exploratory factor analysis with 84 in-service teachers (TG1) grouped 31 of the original 42 items into six factors; the article reports "The overall Cronbach's alpha was 0.94" and CFA on 70 teachers (TG2) yielded alpha 0.93 with acceptable fit indices.

"According to preliminary results, 31 of the original 42 items in TQsrl were grouped into these six factors, and they comply with the original factors of the TQsrl structure."

Avivit Arvatz 2025 (2)¶

Avivit Arvatz, Roee Peretz, Yehudit Judy Dori. (2025). Self-regulated learning and reflection: a tool for teachers and students. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-025-09415-3

q2 · i? · design · r2

EFA on 89 seventh-graders (SG1) grouped 15 of 18 items into five factors; a CFA on 119 students (SG2) gave overall alpha 0.88, and "two distinct factors emerged: a factor for reflection on action and a factor for reflection for action."

"After checking for 4, 5, and 6 factors 15 out of the original 18 items in SQsrl, the items were grouped into the five factors with an overall Cronbach's alpha of 0.91."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The GenAI-SRL scale shows satisfactory reliability, convergent validity, and discriminant validity across its six dimensions — related
• The MAKQ dimensions show acceptable internal consistency across both studies (alphas 0.77-0.93) — related
• Existing online SRL questionnaires show reliability problems, with most having at least one scale outside the acceptable Cronbach's alpha range — related
• TAILS dimensions show high internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha values above 0.90 — related
• The post-interaction reflection instrument showed satisfactory internal consistency (Cronbach's α = .863) — related
• A high Cronbach's alpha across items measuring distinct knowledge aspects indicates the test is not working as intended — related