Tabletop learning-analytics correlations with collaboration were not statistically significant but suggest post hoc identification of less collaborative teams¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2016: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the tabletop study of student triads, correlations between automatically captured interaction measures and collaboration classifications were not statistically significant, but the editors suggest refined versions could be useful in identifying, at least post hoc, teams behaving less collaboratively than desired. → Gerry Stahl 2013
Evidence¶
Gerry Stahl 2013¶
Gerry Stahl, Nancy Law & Friedrich Hesse. (2013). Reigniting CSCL flash themes. Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning 8:369–374. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-013-9185-0
q2 · i? · associational · r?
The editorial describes the Martinez-Maldonado et al. study, in which captured voice and object-manipulation actions on the tabletop were automatically classified and triads were compared on verbal and/or physical participation using Meier et al. (2007) collaboration dimensions.
"Although the correlations are not statistically significant, they suggest that refined versions of this approach could be useful in identifying, at least post hoc, teams that are behaving less collaboratively than desired."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Technology-enhanced tabletop exercises delivered via IXP across 25 exercises and 743 participants showed increased student engagement and collaboration and clearer instructor visibility. — related
- Diffusion-based centralities show moderate-to-strong statistically significant positive correlations with the frequency of information sharing and argumentation utterances in CSCL — related
- In the collaborative MIT App Inventor study, significant interaction patterns signified coordination of behavior between team participants, and no lower self-efficacy emerged for non-CS-background participants — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
tabletop-analytics-nonsignificant-posthoc-identification |
title |
Tabletop learning-analytics correlations with collaboration were not statistically significant but suggest post hoc identification of less collaborative teams |
description |
Tabletop learning-analytics correlations with collaboration were not statistically significant but suggest post hoc identification of less collaborative teams |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2013 |
recheck_by |
2016 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — gerry-stahl-2013 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.