Claims

Frequency of TAC tutors' classroom visits was positively associated with learning outcomes, though the relationship is noncausal

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The more classroom visits TAC tutors undertook during Term 1, the higher the pupils' learning outcomes. → Piper 2015

Evidence

Piper 2015

Piper, B., Jepkemei, E., Kwayumba, D., & Kibukho, K. (2015). Kenya's ICT Policy in Practice: The Effectiveness of Tablets and E-readers in Improving Student Outcomes. FIRE: Forum for International Research in Education, 2(1). http://preserve.lehigh.edu/fire/vol2/iss1/2

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Comparative analysis of performance against the frequency of school visits made by TAC tutors during Term 1, reported in the Results section. The article explicitly labels this a "noncausal relationship"; no coefficient or effect size is printed. The authors suggest it may reflect tutors' supervision and support effort.

"revealed a noncausal relationship between visits and learning outcomes such that the more classroom visits the TAC tutors undertook, the higher the learning outcomes"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.