Claims

In post-wargaming debriefings, teachers and students delineate tactics from related areas of military competence such as teamwork, communication, and technology

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Teachers recurrently draw distinctions between tactics and other phenomena such as communication, teamwork, and technology when steering debriefing discussions, and students adopt these distinctions. → Sjöblom 2025

Evidence

Sjöblom 2025

Sjöblom, B., & Lymer, G. (2025). Conceptual socialization in debriefing: tactics as an object of knowledge in wargame interactions. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-025-09717-8

q2 · i? · qualitative · r3

Microethnographic analysis of video-recorded debriefing sessions from wargaming-based tactics courses at the Swedish Defence University. The analysis finds participants, especially teachers, invoke tactics while drawing boundaries, with the teamwork/communication distinction the most common: "the most common distinction that is explicitly drawn in our data".

"Teamwork and communication are very salient features of the exercises, which might explain why it is also the most common distinction that is explicitly drawn in our data."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id tactics-delineated-from-related-competence-debriefing
title In post-wargaming debriefings, teachers and students delineate tactics from related areas of military competence such as teamwork, communication, and technology
description In post-wargaming debriefings, teachers and students delineate tactics from related areas of military competence such as teamwork, communication, and technology
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — sjöblom-2025

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.