Claims

Task-essentialness and productive use of new words in goal-directed activity may positively affect vocabulary learning and retention

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? McCafferty, Roebuck, and Wayland found that increased mental effort and productive use of new words in peer interviews might positively affect learning and retention, with task-essentialness important for lexical learning. → Restrepo Ramos 2015

Evidence

Restrepo Ramos 2015

Restrepo Ramos, F. D. (2015). Incidental vocabulary learning in second language acquisition: A literature review. PROFILE Issues in Teachers' Professional Development, 17(1), 157-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.15446/profile.v17n1.43957

q2 · i? · causal · r1

The review reports, citing McCafferty et al. (2001), a preliminary study applying Vygotsky's activity theory with five native English speakers in a third-semester Spanish class, comparing a writing task control with peer-interview experimental conditions; findings are hedged with might.

"Findings showed that increased mental effort and the productive use of new words in the experimental condition might positively affect learning and retention. Moreover, the researchers argue that task-essentialness"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id task-essentialness-goal-directed-vocabulary-retention
title Task-essentialness and productive use of new words in goal-directed activity may positively affect vocabulary learning and retention
description Task-essentialness and productive use of new words in goal-directed activity may positively affect vocabulary learning and retention
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2015
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — restrepo-ramos-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.