Claims

TBL remains largely supplementary in pre-clinical medical education, with only a few institutions using it as the primary teaching method

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2031: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Across included studies, TBL was mostly used in conjunction with other pedagogical approaches; only a few institutions, primarily in Australia, used it as a primary teaching method, and sessions averaged 3 hours. → Ahmad-Naik Danish 2026

Evidence

Ahmad-Naik Danish 2026

Ahmad-Naik Danish, Webb Alexandra, Namboothiri Vaishnavi Krishnan, Valter Krisztina. (2026). The practices and strategies for implementing team-based learning in pre-clinical medical education: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08713-x

q2 · i? · review · r2

The review's synthesis of 37 studies reports that TBL is "largely supplementary" in pre-clinical programs, with most schools combining it with other pedagogies and typical session length averaging 3 hours.

"However, TBL remains largely supplementary, with only a few institutions (primarily in Australia) using it as a primary teaching method. Most studies use TBL in conjunction with other pedagogical approaches, and TBL sessions, when delivered, were reported to be, on average, 3 h in length"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.