Claims

Within the task-based group, technical vocabulary scores rose significantly from pre-test to post-test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group's mean rose from 18.52 on the pre-test to 24.00 on the post-test, a statistically significant difference (paired t = -6.326, df = 24, p = .000). → Abdullah Sarani & Leila Farzaneh Sahebi 2012

Evidence

Abdullah Sarani & Leila Farzaneh Sahebi 2012

Abdullah Sarani & Leila Farzaneh Sahebi. (2012). The Impact of Task-based Approach on Vocabulary Learning in ESP Courses. English Language Teaching, 5(10). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v5n10p118

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Paired-sample t-test on the 25 experimental-group students' teacher-made technical vocabulary scores before and after thirteen weeks of task-based instruction. The article reports the mean increased from 18.52 (SD 5.347) to 24.00 (SD 2.693) and the paired t of -6.326 was significant at p < .05.

"the t-value with its 24 degrees of freedom (df) was -6.326. In fact, the observed (6.326) was more than t-critical (2.064), at 0.05 level of significance (p<.05). As a result, a significant difference was detected between learners’ mean scores in the pre-test and the post-test within the experimental group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.