Claims

TDTS pupils reported more positive attitudes towards science, science lessons and practical work than comparison pupils

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Pupils in TDTS classes reported more positive attitudes towards science on the vast majority of measures, including believing it was important to learn science. → Pam Hanley 2015 q2 i? TDTS pupils were more favourable about practical work across all paired comparisons, looking forward to practicals and finding them fun. → Pam Hanley 2015

Evidence

Pam Hanley 2015

Pam Hanley, Robert Slavin, Louise Elliott. (2015). Thinking, Doing, Talking Science: Evaluation report and Executive summary. Education Endowment Foundation. http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN54969918

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Pupil attitude questionnaire (adapted from Kind, Jones and Barmby, 2007) analysed by paired comparison of school-level means across 19 matched school pairs; no effect sizes reported. In 16 of 19 pairs, importance of learning science was expressed more strongly in the intervention school.

"Pupils in classes following the approach reported having more positive attitudes towards science on the vast majority of measures, and were more likely to believe that it was important to learn science."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.