Dimensional comparisons carried out by teachers and classmates show no contrast effects on students' self-concepts, unlike students' own comparisons¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? When teachers and classmates were asked about students' subject-specific self-concepts, no contrast effects from dimensional comparisons emerged; Dai (2002) found dimensional comparison effects only for parents judging children's abilities, not self-concepts. → Jens Möller 2024
Evidence¶
Jens Möller 2024¶
Jens Möller. (2024). Ten Years of Dimensional Comparison Theory: On the Development of a Theory from Educational Psychology. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09918-6
q2 · i? · review · r2
The review reports that "When teachers (Marsh et al., 1984) and classmates (Pohlmann et al., 2004) were asked about students’ subject-specific self-concepts, no contrast effects from dimensional comparisons emerged", while Dai (2002) found such effects for parents judging abilities.
"When teachers (Marsh et al., 1984) and classmates (Pohlmann et al., 2004) were asked about students’ subject-specific self-concepts, no contrast effects from dimensional comparisons emerged."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Academic Self-Concept — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Dimensional comparison effects extend to subjective task values, with contrast effects strongest for intrinsic value and costs and lowest for utility value, often mediated by self-concept — related
- The net effect of dimensional comparisons is contested: early evidence suggested a positive net effect, but later experiments found downward and upward effects cancel out — related
- Dimensional comparisons: achievement–self-concept paths are positive in similar subjects but negative in dissimilar subjects — related
- Subject similarity moderates dimensional comparison effects: far comparisons (e.g., math vs. verbal) yield strong contrast effects, near comparisons yield weaker contrast or assimilation effects — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
teacher-classmate-dimensional-comparisons-no-contrast |
title |
Dimensional comparisons carried out by teachers and classmates show no contrast effects on students' self-concepts, unlike students' own comparisons |
description |
Dimensional comparisons carried out by teachers and classmates show no contrast effects on students' self-concepts, unlike students' own comparisons |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — jens-möller-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.