Teachers reported the highest confidence in their situational awareness in the alerting & guiding dashboard condition¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Self-rated confidence in SAGAT answers (1–4) was highest in the alerting & guiding dashboard condition, with generally high confidence suggesting a possible ceiling effect. → Reet Kasepalu 2023
Evidence¶
Reet Kasepalu 2023¶
Reet Kasepalu, Pankaj Chejara, Luis P. Prieto, Tobias Ley. (2023). Studying teacher withitness in the wild: comparing a mirroring and an alerting & guiding dashboard for collaborative learning. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn (2023) 18:575–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-023-09414-z
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Descriptive analysis of confidence ratings collected with each adapted SAGAT statement (scale 1 just guessing to 4 very confident) across the three conditions; "the teachers feel the most confident in the alerting & guiding dashboard condition", with the authors noting a possible ceiling effect. No test statistic printed.
"In Fig. 7 we can see that the teachers feel the most confident in the alerting & guiding dashboard condition, but also that they are generally quite confident (we may be witnessing a 'ceiling effect')."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Mirroring dashboards improved teacher situational awareness while alerting-and-guiding dashboards reduced teacher workload and frustration — related
- Dashboard support type did not influence detection of CSCL events but did influence teachers' interpretation of the situation — related
- Teacher interviews identified five types of monitored information and, via the Kano method, four highest-priority dashboard indicators for CSCL monitoring — related
- The alerting & guiding dashboard did not increase teacher coregulation more than the mirroring dashboard (H3 not supported); mirroring increased intervention rates (non-significant) while guiding-condition interventions were rare and mostly coregulation strategies — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
teacher-confidence-highest-with-guiding-dashboard |
title |
Teachers reported the highest confidence in their situational awareness in the alerting & guiding dashboard condition |
description |
Teachers reported the highest confidence in their situational awareness in the alerting & guiding dashboard condition |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — reet-kasepalu-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.