Claims

Teachers rank language level, student interests, and student needs as top criteria for selecting authentic listening materials

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Teachers indicated language level first, students' interests second, and their needs third among selection criteria, with vocabulary percentage and course objectives also ranked. → Zhafarghandi et al. 2014

Evidence

Zhafarghandi et al. 2014

Amir Mahdavi Zhafarghandi, Behzad Barekat, & Sepideh Homaei. (2014). A Survey of Iranian EFL Teachers' and Learners' Perceptions Toward Authentic Listening Materials at University Level. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.5n.4p.184

q2 · i? · associational · r1

Table 7 survey of 30 teachers on selection criteria for authentic listening materials; ranking reported descriptively in the Discussion. Length, grammatical complexity, and text type were also ranked lower.

"the teachers indicated that language level was the first, the students' interests the second and their needs the third. Moreover, the teachers ranked the percentage of new vocabulary fourth and course objectives fifth in deciding upon texts to use."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.