Claims

Teachers' epistemic cognition adds a layer of complexity not present for learners because they manage epistemic aims for both themselves and their students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r3 · q1
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? When acting as teachers, educators must integrate multiple bodies of knowledge and manage learning goals for both students and themselves, adding a layer of epistemic cognition absent for learners. → Fives 2017

Evidence

Fives 2017

Fives, Helenrose, Barnes, Nicole, Buehl, Michelle, Mascadri, Julia, & Ziegler, Nathan. (2017). Teachers’ epistemic cognition in classroom assessment. Educational Psychologist, 52(4), pp. 270-283. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2017.1323218

q1 · i? · theoretical · r3

Theoretical argument in the section on epistemic cognition in teaching: teachers extend consideration of a topic like formative assessment beyond personal learning to its use for teaching particular content to particular students, "thereby adding a layer of epistemic cognition that is not present for learners" (Fives & Buehl, 2008, 2010, as cited by the authors).

"This requires teachers to integrate multiple bodies of knowledge (e.g., knowledge of pedagogy, subject matter, and students) and to manage learning goals for both their students"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id teacher-epistemic-cognition-more-complex-than-learners
title Teachers' epistemic cognition adds a layer of complexity not present for learners because they manage epistemic aims for both themselves and their students
description Teachers' epistemic cognition adds a layer of complexity not present for learners because they manage epistemic aims for both themselves and their students
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2017
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — fives-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.