Teachers evaluated the PD moderately positively, and about three-quarters reported actually using what they learned in their mathematics lessons¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The majority of teachers (76.3% in Cohort 1 and 76.7% in Cohort 2) mostly or fully agreed that they used what they learned in the PD for preparation and teaching of mathematics lessons, and teachers perceived positive effects on students' motivation and achievement. → Prast 2018
Evidence¶
Prast 2018¶
Prast, E. J., Van de Weijer-Bergsma, E., Kroesbergen, E. H., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2018). Differentiated instruction in primary mathematics: Effects of teacher professional development on student achievement. Learning and Instruction, 54, 22-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.009
q2 · i? · causal · r2
Self-report evaluation questionnaire (15 items, five-point Likert scale) completed by 76 Cohort 1 teachers at the end of Year 1 and 73 Cohort 2 teachers at the end of Year 2. Scores were above the scale midpoint for all questions; perceived effects on motivation and achievement are teacher perceptions, not measured outcomes.
"Moreover, the majority of teachers (76.3% and 76.7% of teachers who completed the questionnaire in Cohort 1 and 2, respectively) mostly or fully agreed that they actually used what they had learned in the PD for the preparation and teaching of their mathematics lessons."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Teacher PD on differentiated instruction produced a small significant positive effect on mathematics achievement growth in Year 1 (β = 0.15, p = .007) — related
- Teachers participating in the micro-credential collaborative reported positive receptivity, with 84 percent agreeing micro-credentials were significant to their computational thinking learning — related
- Computational thinking professional development was the most-cited support for integrating computational thinking into lessons, cited by 54 percent of teachers — related
- Collaborative planning time with colleagues was the top support cited by teachers earning micro-credentials, cited by 74 percent of respondents — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
teacher-evaluation-pd-uptake |
title |
Teachers evaluated the PD moderately positively, and about three-quarters reported actually using what they learned in their mathematics lessons |
description |
Teachers evaluated the PD moderately positively, and about three-quarters reported actually using what they learned in their mathematics lessons |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-23 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — prast-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.