Claims

Students rated teacher feedback as very effective more often than peer feedback in the task-based course

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? More participants (73%) stated teacher feedback was very effective compared to the percentage declaring peer feedback very efficient (38.4%). → Saraç 2018

Evidence

Saraç 2018

Saraç, H. S. (2018). Completing the Task Procedure or Focusing on Form: Contextualizing Grammar Instruction via Task-Based Teaching. College Quarterly, 21(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1169343

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Questionnaire item comparison within the same end-of-term survey of the experimental group; the qualitative themes were "expert opinion" for teacher feedback and betterment of products for peer feedback.

"Nevertheless, more participants (73%) stated that teacher's feedback is very effective when compared to the percent of participants declared that peer feedback is very efficient (38.4%)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.