Claims

Teachers' perceptions of school ICT policy predict classroom ICT use, whereas principals' perspectives show no significant effect

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2008 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? ICT integration in daily class practice is significantly associated with teachers' perceptions of policy-related factors, and no significant effect was found for the principals' perspective. → Tondeur 2008

Evidence

Tondeur 2008

Tondeur, J., van Keer, H., van Braak, J., & Valcke, M. (2008). ICT integration in the classroom: Challenging the potential of a school policy. Computers & Education, 51, 212-223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.003

q2 · i? · associational · r3

Multilevel analysis of the same 574-teacher, 53-school sample; perception of internal ICT support (p < 0.000) and perception of ICT plan content (p < 0.000) were significant, while principals' interview-based perspectives were not. The article prints no effect size for the null principals' result, so none is reported.

"The results point at the fact that ICT integration in daily class practice is significantly associated with teach- ers’ perceptions of policy-related factors. No significant effect on teachers’ ICT use was found for the princi- pals’ perspective."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-29
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.