Teacher-practices subgroup differences were essentially null: none were statistically significant for the second cohort, and five of 60 were significant in the follow-up year.¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causalr2–r3·q3
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? None of the teacher practices subgroup differences were statistically significant for the second cohort of fifth graders. → James-Burdumy 2010
q3 i? Five of 60 teacher practices subgroup differences were statistically significant in the Cohort 1 follow-up analyses. → James-Burdumy 2010 (2)
Evidence¶
James-Burdumy 2010¶
James-Burdumy, S., Deke, J., Lugo-Gil, J., Carey, N., Hershey, A., Gersten, R., Newman-Gonchar, R., Dimino, J., Haymond, K., and Faddis, B. (2010). Effectiveness of Selected Supplemental Reading Comprehension Interventions: Findings From Two Student Cohorts (NCEE 2010-4015). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee
q3 · i? · causal · r3
Section heading for the second-cohort analyses states "NONE OF THE TEACHER PRACTICES SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES ARE STATISTICALL Y SIGNIFICANT", indicating no significant moderation of impacts by teacher practices for Cohort 2.
"E. NONE OF THE TEACHER PRACTICES SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES ARE STATISTICALL Y SIGNIFICANT"
James-Burdumy 2010 (2)¶
James-Burdumy, S., Deke, J., Lugo-Gil, J., Carey, N., Hershey, A., Gersten, R., Newman-Gonchar, R., Dimino, J., Haymond, K., and Faddis, B. (2010). Effectiveness of Selected Supplemental Reading Comprehension Interventions: Findings From Two Student Cohorts (NCEE 2010-4015). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Section heading for the Cohort 1 follow-up analyses states "FIVE OF 60 TEACHER PRACTICES SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES ARE STATISTICALL Y SIGNIFICANT"; the large majority were not significant.
"E. FIVE OF 60 TEACHER PRACTICES SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES ARE STATISTICALL Y SIGNIFICANT"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Student subgroup impact differences were rarely statistically significant: six of 288 differences in the second cohort and eight of 360 subgroup analyses in the follow-up year. — related
- The four supplemental reading comprehension curricula had no statistically significant impacts on students one year after the end of their implementation (Cohort 1 follow-up in sixth grade). — related
- ReadAbout showed a positive, statistically significant impact (effect size 0.22) on social studies reading comprehension for second-cohort students taught by teachers with one prior year of experience with the curriculum. — reports the opposite
- Impacts of the curricula were not statistically significantly larger after schools had one year of experience using them (Cohort 2 fifth graders). — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
teacher-practices-subgroup-differences-mostly-null |
title |
Teacher-practices subgroup differences were essentially null: none were statistically significant for the second cohort, and five of 60 were significant in the follow-up year. |
description |
Teacher-practices subgroup differences were essentially null: none were statistically significant for the second cohort, and five of 60 were significant in the follow-up year. |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2010 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — james-burdumy-2010, james-burdumy-2010-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.