Claims

Teacher-practices subgroup differences were essentially null: none were statistically significant for the second cohort, and five of 60 were significant in the follow-up year.

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r2–r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? None of the teacher practices subgroup differences were statistically significant for the second cohort of fifth graders. → James-Burdumy 2010 q3 i? Five of 60 teacher practices subgroup differences were statistically significant in the Cohort 1 follow-up analyses. → James-Burdumy 2010 (2)

Evidence

James-Burdumy 2010

James-Burdumy, S., Deke, J., Lugo-Gil, J., Carey, N., Hershey, A., Gersten, R., Newman-Gonchar, R., Dimino, J., Haymond, K., and Faddis, B. (2010). Effectiveness of Selected Supplemental Reading Comprehension Interventions: Findings From Two Student Cohorts (NCEE 2010-4015). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee

q3 · i? · causal · r3

Section heading for the second-cohort analyses states "NONE OF THE TEACHER PRACTICES SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES ARE STATISTICALL Y SIGNIFICANT", indicating no significant moderation of impacts by teacher practices for Cohort 2.

"E. NONE OF THE TEACHER PRACTICES SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES ARE STATISTICALL Y SIGNIFICANT"

James-Burdumy 2010 (2)

James-Burdumy, S., Deke, J., Lugo-Gil, J., Carey, N., Hershey, A., Gersten, R., Newman-Gonchar, R., Dimino, J., Haymond, K., and Faddis, B. (2010). Effectiveness of Selected Supplemental Reading Comprehension Interventions: Findings From Two Student Cohorts (NCEE 2010-4015). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Section heading for the Cohort 1 follow-up analyses states "FIVE OF 60 TEACHER PRACTICES SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES ARE STATISTICALL Y SIGNIFICANT"; the large majority were not significant.

"E. FIVE OF 60 TEACHER PRACTICES SUBGROUP DIFFERENCES ARE STATISTICALL Y SIGNIFICANT"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id teacher-practices-subgroup-differences-mostly-null
title Teacher-practices subgroup differences were essentially null: none were statistically significant for the second cohort, and five of 60 were significant in the follow-up year.
description Teacher-practices subgroup differences were essentially null: none were statistically significant for the second cohort, and five of 60 were significant in the follow-up year.
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2010
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — james-burdumy-2010, james-burdumy-2010-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.