Claims

Teachers rated the experiential training package positively, describing it as effective, accountable, and revealing of actual versus perceived performance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Themed analysis of daily reflection journals indicated teachers found the experiential training socially valid and acceptable. → Slim-Topdjian and Pinto Zipp 2016

Evidence

Slim-Topdjian and Pinto Zipp 2016

Lina Slim-Topdjian & Genevieve Pinto Zipp (2016). The Use of Video Self-Monitoring Embedded with Mentorship as a Medium to Enhance Experiential Learning Opportunities and Promote Critical Thinking Skills for Educators and Health Science Professionals Working with Children with Autism. Global Education Review, 3(4), 6-18. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1120743

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Qualitative themed analysis of daily teacher reflection journals written during Phase 2 to assess social validity and acceptability; teachers stated the experiential component was "Very inspiring, insightful, rewarding and effective".

"Overall, the teachers stated that the experiential component of the staff training model was “Very inspiring, insightful, rewarding and effective”, “A quality one, based on my observations of positive results in the child's responses and my instruction”"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.