Claims

Several interviewed teachers reported the PD bolstered their science knowledge, contradicting the survey finding of lower content knowledge in the CS condition

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In interviews, several teachers indicated they believed the intervention PD bolstered their science knowledge considerably, contrary to the survey finding of lower content knowledge in the CS condition. → Desimone and Hill 2017

Evidence

Desimone and Hill 2017

Laura M. Desimone, Kirsten Lee Hill. (2017). Inside the Black Box: Examining Mediators and Moderators of a Middle School Science Intervention. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373717697842

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Interview theme from the subsample of 14 IRE-unit teachers: Betty, Lisa, and Gina each described improved science knowledge and comfort answering student questions. No effect size is printed; this is teachers' self-report, not a tested outcome.

"Although our survey analysis detected small negative effects between the intervention and content knowledge, in interviews, several teach- ers indicated that they believed the intervention PD bolstered their science knowledge consider- ably"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.