Teachers' self-reported cue utilization attributes are not significantly correlated with their monitoring accuracy (Experiment 2).¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Point-biserial correlations between each self-reported attribute (e.g., main ideas, details, number, length) and monitoring accuracy were all non-significant, all ps > .081. → Jan A. A. Engelen 2018
Evidence¶
Jan A. A. Engelen 2018¶
Jan A. A. Engelen, Gino Camp, Janneke van de Pol, Anique B. H. de Bruin. (2018). Teachers' monitoring of students' text comprehension: can students' keywords and summaries improve teachers' judgment accuracy? Metacognition and Learning 13:287–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-018-9187-4
q3 · i? · causal · r2
Experiment 2 retrospective reports: 15 teachers described which keyword and summary attributes they used; attributes were coded inductively and correlated (point-biserial) with monitoring accuracy. "None of the attributes were significantly correlated with monitoring accuracy, all ps > .081." Most-mentioned attributes were main ideas (n = 9 keywords; n = 10 summaries) and details.
"None of the attributes were significantly correlated with monitoring accuracy, all ps > .081."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students tend to rely on non-diagnostic cues when judging their own performance, resulting in inaccurate judgments — a broader claim this one bears on
- A brief cue-diagnosticity intervention did not significantly improve teachers' judgment accuracy, presumably because accuracy was already relatively high — related
- The quality of sixth-graders' keywords is not diagnostic of intra-individual variation in test performance (Experiment 1). — related
- Feedback training did not change children's cue utilization despite repeated metacognitive experiences — related
- Pre-structured diagrams improved metacomprehension accuracy while self-assessment cues showed no differences — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
teacher-self-reported-cue-use-not-linked-to-accuracy |
title |
Teachers' self-reported cue utilization attributes are not significantly correlated with their monitoring accuracy (Experiment 2). |
description |
Teachers' self-reported cue utilization attributes are not significantly correlated with their monitoring accuracy (Experiment 2). |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — jan-a-a-engelen-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.