Teachers implemented interleaved practice without training and, surveyed before learning the results, mostly judged it useful and viable though slightly harder and more time-consuming¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Most of the 15 teachers agreed interleaved practice improves exam scores, suits low- and high-achieving students, and that they would recommend it. → Doug Rohrer 2019
q2 i? A majority reported students found interleaved practice slightly harder (9) and more time-consuming (13) than blocked practice. → Doug Rohrer 2019
Evidence¶
Doug Rohrer 2019¶
Doug Rohrer, Robert F. Dedrick, Marissa K. Hartwig, Chi-Ngai Cheung. (2019). A Randomized Controlled Trial of Interleaved Mathematics Practice. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://osf.io/pfeg4/
q2 · i? · causal · r3
Anonymous 23-item paper-and-pencil survey completed by all 15 teachers several weeks after the test, before they were told the results, preceded by a brief tutorial. "a good way to improve students' scores on unit exams (14)".
"Teachers agreed (or strongly agreed) that interleaved practice is a good way to improve students' scores on unit exams (14) and final exams (14) and is appropriate for both low-achieving students (13) and high-achieving math students (15)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Interleaving category examples improves inductive category learning for visual and mathematical materials, but not for expository texts or word categories — related
- Learners overwhelmingly judge blocking more effective than interleaving even when their test performance favors interleaving — related
- Retrieval practice and spaced retrieval improve achievement and retention by medium amounts, while interleaving helps category learning only for some materials and blocking beats it for words — related
- Stakeholder reflections judged the ten-week, 30-minute-session facts intervention feasible within the elementary schedule, with moderate-to-high student engagement — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.