Teacher-reported trust and influence vary sharply between top- and bottom-quartile schools on leadership measures¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2005 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2010: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In top-quartile schools on Teacher-Principal Trust, 39 percent of teachers report very strong trust and 47 percent strong trust, while in bottom-quartile schools a little less than half describe minimal or no trust. → Luppescu 2005
Evidence¶
Luppescu 2005¶
Luppescu, S., & Hart, H. (2005). Improving Chicago's Schools 2005 Survey Report: Details of Student and Teacher Responses. Consortium on Chicago School Research. https://consortium.uchicago.edu/publications/improving-chicagos-schools-sample-high-school-details-2005
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Summary comparison of Teacher-Principal Trust scale responses across school quartiles in the 2005 survey. The report adds that 'A little less than half of the teachers in the bottom quartile schools describe minimal or no trust between teachers and principals,' with 41 percent noting strong and 12 percent very strong trust.
"In the top quartile, 39 percent of the teachers note very strong trust between teachers and the principal, and another 47 percent describe strong trust."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Teachers rate principal instructional leadership highly even in many bottom-quartile schools — related
- Teacher-principal trust is far more prevalent in top-quartile schools than bottom-quartile schools — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Joint problem solving distinguishes top- from bottom-quartile Chicago high schools: half of top-quartile teachers describe strong processes plus 13 percent very strong, while bottom-quartile teachers most often describe weak processes (46 percent) — related
- Principal leadership regard is nearly unanimous in top quartile schools but low for about 40 percent of teachers in bottom quartile schools — related
- Teacher influence over school decisions is minimal or limited for most teachers in bottom quartile schools but extensive or moderate for most in top quartile schools — related
- Teachers in top-quartile schools hold their principals in high regard as facilitative, inclusive, committed leaders — related
- Facilitative, inclusive principal leadership and effective principal supervision are associated with more positive trust relations — related
- Teacher views of Local School Council contribution differ sharply between top and bottom quartile schools — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
teacher-trust-influence-quartile-differences |
title |
Teacher-reported trust and influence vary sharply between top- and bottom-quartile schools on leadership measures |
description |
Teacher-reported trust and influence vary sharply between top- and bottom-quartile schools on leadership measures |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2005 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
recheck_by |
2010 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — luppescu-2005 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.