Language teachers in two workshops responded positively to the evaluation framework, leading to a four-category revision¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In workshop evaluations with 18 language teachers in Ireland (2014) and 26 language teachers in Cyprus (2015), participants were positive about the criteria and their feedback shaped the framework's revision. → Rosell-Aguilar 2017

Evidence¶

Rosell-Aguilar 2017¶

Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2017). State of the App: A Taxonomy and Framework for Evaluating Language Learning Mobile Applications. CALICO Journal. https://doi.org/10.1558/cj.27623

q2 · i? · design · r2

Section 4 reports two workshop evaluations: 18 language teachers in Ireland (October 2014) and 26 in Cyprus (November 2015), each ending with oral focus-group feedback. Cyprus teachers found the Language Learning category too abstract, so it was rewritten in plainer terms.

"All participants were positive about the use of the criteria and reported that the criteria helped them shape their own evaluation of language-learning apps."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• In two online comparisons, a rubric changed what peer reviewers commented on (one study) and helped peer raters place writing in quality tiers, most for complex criteria (the other); the first study says the rubric restrained reflective thinking — related
• Self Assessment Improves Self Regulated Learning — related
• Mixed-disciplinary teacher making supports transdisciplinary epistemic liberation — related
• A formative study with 12 clinical-year medical students produced four design-oriented themes for AI-SP consultation practice — related