Claims

Teachers least often taught the aspects of the ERWC curriculum associated with writing and metacognition

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Among curriculum components, teachers least often taught the aspects associated with writing and metacognition. → Fong 2022

Evidence

Fong 2022

Fong, A., Porterfield, A., Skjoldhorne, S., & Hadley, L. (2022). Expanding the Expository Reading and Writing Curriculum: An evaluation of an Investing in Innovation Validation grant. WestEd. https://www.wested.org/resources/expanding-the-erwc-evaluation/

q2 · i? · design · r3

Implementation evaluation finding on which ERWC curriculum components teachers taught least, consistent with findings from the previous ERWC 2.0 evaluation. The report prints no effect size or frequency counts in the quoted finding.

"Moreover, teachers least often taught the aspects of the curriculum that were associated with writing and metacognition."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id teachers-least-often-taught-writing-and-metacognition
title Teachers least often taught the aspects of the ERWC curriculum associated with writing and metacognition
description Teachers least often taught the aspects of the ERWC curriculum associated with writing and metacognition
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2022
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — fong-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.