The control group taught with the teacher's manual showed no statistically significant within-group gain in reading comprehension from pre-test to post-test¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The control group's pre-test to post-test reading comprehension difference was not significant (t = 1.83, p = .078). → Yutthasak Sawangsamutchai & Saowalak Rattanavich 2016

Evidence¶

Yutthasak Sawangsamutchai & Saowalak Rattanavich 2016¶

Yutthasak Sawangsamutchai & Saowalak Rattanavich. (2016). A Comparison of Seventh Grade Thai Students' Reading Comprehension and Motivation to Read English through Applied Instruction Based on the Genre-Based Approach and the Teacher's Manual. English Language Teaching, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n4p54

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Within-group dependent-samples t-test for the control group in Table 1: pre-test mean 9.87 (S.D. 2.66), post-test mean 10.90 (S.D. 2.71), t = 1.83 with p = .078, above the .05 threshold. Equivalence was not tested.

"Control 30 Pretest 9.87 2.66 1.83* .078 10.90 2.71"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Seventh-grade Thai students taught with applied instruction through the genre-based approach achieved significantly higher English reading comprehension post-test scores than students taught with the teacher's manual — related