Teaching with teaching aids produced higher post-test interest among elementary school children than teaching without teaching aids¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In a quasi-experiment with 400 pupils aged 5-6 in ten Nigerian schools, the experimental group taught with teaching aids scored a post-test interest mean of 310.0000 versus 131.2000 for the control group, and the ANCOVA showed a significant difference (F = 47.191, Sig. .000). → Joseph 2015

Evidence¶

Joseph 2015¶

Joseph, O. C. (2015). Teaching Aids a Special Pedagogy Tool of Brain Development in School Children, Interest and Academic Achievement to Enhance Future Technology. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(29). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1081258

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Quasi-experimental study of intact classes in ten Delta State schools (200 control, 200 experimental pupils); ANCOVA on Interest Inventory Test post-tests. The article reports "the calculated F-Value 47.191" with Sig. .000; descriptive means were 310.0000 (experimental) versus 131.2000 (control).

"the calculated F-Value 47.191 is > greater than P-Value .000 as shown in the table. It therefore means that ther e is a significant difference between the use of te aching aids to teach children in elementary school level and the interest of children"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Post-test scores were more consistent (lower standard deviation) in the teaching-aids groups than in the control groups on both measures — related
• Multimedia motivational introductory messages produce better immediate knowledge-test outcomes than traditional teaching aids in elementary Nature and Society lessons — related