Students' technology acceptance increased significantly after taking a MAIC course¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Pre-post comparison showed a significant overall increase in technology acceptance, with significant gains in Habit, Effort Expectancy, and Facilitating Conditions. → Jifan Yu 2024

Evidence¶

Jifan Yu 2024¶

Jifan Yu, Zheyuan Zhang, Daniel Zhang-li, Shangqing Tu, Zhanxin Hao, Ruimiao Li, Haoxuan Li, Yuanchun Wang, Hanming Li, Linlu Gong, Jie Cao, Jiayin Lin, Jinchang Zhou, Fei Qin, Haohua Wang, Jianxiao Jiang, Lijun Deng, Yisi Zhan, Chaojun Xiao, Xusheng Dai, Xuan Yan, Nianyi Lin, Nan Zhang, Ruixin Ni, Yang Dang, Lei Hou, Yu Zhang, Xu Han, Manli Li, Juanzi Li, Zhiyuan Liu, Huiqin Liu, Maosong Sun. (2024). From MOOC to MAIC: Reshaping Online Teaching and Learning through LLM-driven Agents. Preprint. Under review. https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03512 doi:10.48550/arxiv.2409.03512

q2 · i? · design · r2

Pre- and post-course technology acceptance questionnaires in the MAIC pilot. The article reports 'a significant overall increase in technology acceptance (N = 111,t = 3.05,p = 0.002),' with significant improvements in Habit (t = 2.81, p = 0.005), Effort Expectancy (t = 3.98, p < 0.001), and Facilitating Conditions (t = 3.22, p = 0.002).

"The results demonstrated a significant overall increase in technology acceptance (N = 111,t = 3.05,p = 0.002)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Students in MAIC tend to prefer the passive continuous mode over interactive mode
• Predicted post-test distributions differed significantly from real distributions in four dimensions, with no significant difference only for Technology Acceptance
• In the MAIC case study, student development agent predictions (Concept and Scales methods) outperformed the mean baseline across all five non-cognitive dimensions on RMSE and MAE — related