Technology-enhanced assessment items were studied as a potential means of increasing student test engagement and reducing disengagement¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q1
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? The study investigated whether technology-enhanced items can increase student engagement on assessments, addressing test-taker disengagement. → Steven Wise 2019
Evidence¶
Steven Wise 2019¶
Steven Wise, James Soland, Laurence Dupray. (2019). The impact of technology-enhanced items on test-taker disengagement. NWEA Research. https://www.nwea.org/research/publication/the-impact-of-technology-enhanced-items-on-test-taker-disengagement/
q1 · i? · causal · r?
The publisher's description of the 2019 NWEA research brief frames the study's question: "Can technology-enhanced items increase student engagement on assessments?" The supplied text prints only this framing; no findings, sample, or statistics are reported in the available text.
"Can technology-enhanced items increase student engagement on assessments? A new study provides insight."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Test takers generally disengage during only a portion of their items, and these disengaged responses reflect a momentary cessation of measurement — related
- Disengaged test taking materially impacts individual state summative test scores but may have relatively minor impact on score aggregations — related
- Test-taking engagement plays an essential role in the pursuit of valid scores — a broader claim this one bears on
- Effort-moderated scoring estimates disengaged test takers' performance by excluding disengaged responses and scoring the remaining responses — related
- E-M scoring leaves residual score distortion, suggesting some disengaged test responses are nonrapid rather than rapid guesses — related
- Responses used in effort-moderated scoring can sometimes reflect less-than-full, or partial, engagement, making E-M scores less trustworthy — related
- Representational pictures enhance test-taker enjoyment, response certainty, and reduce rapid-guessing behaviour — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
technology-enhanced-items-studied-for-test-engagement |
title |
Technology-enhanced assessment items were studied as a potential means of increasing student test engagement and reducing disengagement |
description |
Technology-enhanced assessment items were studied as a potential means of increasing student test engagement and reducing disengagement |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2019 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-09 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — steven-wise-2019 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.