Technology type did not significantly moderate effects on metacognitive outcomes, though generative-AI interventions showed a descriptively larger estimate¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Technology type (non-AI, non-generative AI, generative AI) did not significantly moderate the pooled association, F(2, 30) = 2.66, p = .087. → Yijia Yuan & Yiran Du 2026
Evidence¶
Yijia Yuan & Yiran Du 2026¶
Yijia Yuan & Yiran Du. (2026). Technology-Supported Interventions and Learners' Metacognition: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10227-3
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3
Exploratory univariable three-level moderator analysis across eight moderators; the technology-type omnibus test was non-significant and did not survive BH-FDR adjustment (adjusted p = .173).
"Technology type did not moderate the pooled association, F(2, 30) = 2.66, p =.087."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Instructional approach, AI technology type, assessment instrument, educational level, and publication year do not significantly moderate AI literacy intervention effects — related
- Gen-AI has a moderate positive overall effect on students' higher-order thinking (g = 0.609) across 29 experimental and quasi-experimental studies — related
- Guidance, immediate feedback, and system-directed control showed unadjusted moderator signals that did not survive multiplicity adjustment, making them hypothesis-generating only — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
technology-type-did-not-moderate-metacognition-effects |
title |
Technology type did not significantly moderate effects on metacognitive outcomes, though generative-AI interventions showed a descriptively larger estimate |
description |
Technology type did not significantly moderate effects on metacognitive outcomes, though generative-AI interventions showed a descriptively larger estimate |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — yijia-yuan-yiran-du-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.